Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 30 May 2007

Abstract

Human land use of forested regions has intensified worldwide in recent decades, threatening long-term sustainability. Primary effects include conversion of land cover or reversion to an earlier stage of successional development. Both types of change can have cascading effects through ecosystems; however, the long-term effects where forests are allowed to regrow are poorly understood. We quantify the regional-scale consequences of a century of Euro-American land use in the northern U.S. Great Lakes region using a combination of historical Public Land Survey records and current forest inventory and land cover data. Our analysis shows a distinct and rapid trajectory of vegetation change toward historically unprecedented and simplified conditions. In addition to overall loss of forestland, current forests are marked by lower species diversity, functional diversity, and structural complexity compared to pre-Euro-American forests. Today’s forest is marked by dominance of broadleaf deciduous species—all 55 ecoregions that comprise the region exhibit a lower relative dominance of conifers in comparison to the pre-Euro-American period. Aspen (Populus grandidentata and P. tremuloides) and maple (Acer saccharum and A. rubrum) species comprise the primary deciduous species that have replaced conifers. These changes reflect the cumulative effects of local forest alterations over the region and they affect future ecosystem conditions as well as the ecosystem services they provide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MC (1998) The red maple paradox. BioScience 48:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert DA (1995) Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. General Technical Report NC178. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, 250 pp

  • Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa Pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Anderson MR (1975) The presettlement vegetation of Williamson County, Illinois. Castanea 40:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockheim JG, Crowley SE (2002) Ion cycling in hemlock-hardwood forests of the southern Lake Superior region: a preliminary study. J Environ Qual 31:1620–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdo EA Jr (1956) A review of the General Land Office survey and of its use in quantitative studies of former forests. Ecology 37:754–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL, Gower ST (2000) Detritus production and soil N transformations in old-growth eastern hemlock and sugar maple stands. Ecosystems 3:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen JP, Pacala SW, Jenkins JC, Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR, Birdsey RA (2000) Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulations in US forests. Science 290:1148–1151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland DT, Avers RE, McNab WH, Jensen ME, Bailey RG, King T, Russell WE (1997) National hierarchical framework of ecological units. In: Boyce MS, Haney A (eds) Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA, pp 181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole KL, Davis MB, Stearns F, Guntenspergen G, Walker K (1998) Historical landcover changes in the Great Lakes region. In: Sisk T (ed) Perspectives on the land use history of North America: a context for understanding our changing environment. U.S. Geological Survey, Springfield, VA, USA, pp 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow TR, Buckley DS, Nauertz EA, Zasada JC (2002) Effects of management on the composition and structure of northern hardwood forests in upper Michigan. Forest Sci 48:129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RN, Moser HC (1938) Forest areas and timber volumes in the Lake States. Economic Notes Number 10. Lake States Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Czederpiltz D, Linder L, Stanoz GR (1999) Forest management and the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi. McIlvainea 14:34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB (1981) Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities. In: West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DB (eds) Forest succession. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, pp 132–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliot K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers Ecol Env 3:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998) Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EH, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B (1998) Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:96–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE (1995) Old forest in the Lake States today and before European settlement. Nat Areas J 15:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Lorimer CG (1991a) Natural disturbance regimes in hemlock-hardwood forests of the Upper Great Lakes region. Ecol Monogr 61:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Lorimer CG (1991b) A simulation of landscape-level stand dynamics in the northern hardwood region. J Ecol 79:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman SK, Reich PB (2005) Regional legacies of logging: departure from presettlement forest conditions in northern Minnesota. Ecol Appl 15:726–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller JL, Foster DR, McLachlan TS, Drake N (1998) Impact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough RJ (1997) Farming the cutover: a social history of Northern Wisconsin, 1900–1940. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, 295 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA, Harrison RP Jr, Westell CE Jr (1963) Aspens: phoenix trees of the Great Lakes Region. University Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 272 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinselman ML (1973) Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Quat Res 3:320–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science 285:574–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keys J Jr, Carpenter C, Hooks S, Koenig F, McNab WH, Russell W, Smith ML (1995) Ecological units of the eastern United States – first approximation. USDA Forest Service, Atlanta, GA, USA

  • Kling GW, Hayhoe K, Johnson LB, Magnuson JJ, Polaski S, Robinson SK, Shuter BJ, Wander MM, Wuebbles DJ, Zak DR, Lindroth RL, Moser SC, Wilson ML (2003) Confronting climate change in the Great Lakes Region: impacts on our communities and ecosystems. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC, USA, 92 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Howe KM, Reich PB, Siemann E, Groth J (1999) Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol Lett 2:286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landres PB, Morgan P, Swanson FJ (1999) Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 9:1179–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Latty EF, Werner SM, Mladenoff DJ, Raffa KF, Sickley TA (2006) Response of ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages to logging history in northern hardwood-hemlock forests. For Ecol Manage 222:335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer CG (2003) The decline of oak forests. BioScience 53:915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane DW, Meyer SP (2005) Characteristics and distribution of potential ash tree hosts for emerald ash borer. For Ecol Manage 213:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik AU (1995) Conversion of temperate forests into heaths – role of ecosystem disturbance and ericaceous plants. Environ Manage 19:675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manies KL, Mladenoff DJ, Nordheim EV (2001) Assessing large-scale surveyor variability in the historic forest data of the original U.S. Public Land Survey. Can J For Res 10:1719–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, vol 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 300 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles PD, Brand GJ, Alerich CL, Bednar LF, Woudenberg SW, Glover JF, Ezzell EN (2001) The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and users manual version 1.0. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, 130 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TF, Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK (2002) Old-growth northern hardwood forests: spatial autocorrelation and patterns of understory vegetation. Ecol Monogr 72:487–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Stearns F (1993) Eastern hemlock regeneration and deer browsing in the northern Great Lakes region: a re-examination and model simulation. Conserv Biol 7:889–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, White MA, Pastor J, Crow TR (1993) Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Haight RG, Sickley TA, Wydeven AP (1997) Causes and implications of species restoration in altered ecosystems. BioScience 47:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Dahir SE, Nordheim EV, Schulte LA, Guntenspergen GR (2002) Narrowing historical uncertainty: probabilistic classification of ambiguously identified tree species in historical forest survey data. Ecosystems 5:539–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Palik BJ, Pregitzer KS (1992) A comparison of presettlement and present-day forests on two bigtooth aspen-dominated landscapes in northern lower Michigan. Am Midl Nat 127:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts R, Gustafson E, Stewart SI, Thompson FR, Bergen K, Brown DG, Hammer R, Radeloff V, Bengston D, Sauer J, Sturtevant B (2004) The changing midwest assessment: land cover, natural resources, and people. Gen Tech Rep NC-250, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, 87 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, He HS, Boyce MS (1999) Forest landscape change: the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens before European settlement and today. Can J For Res 29:1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, Boyce MS (2000) A historical perspective and future outlook on landscape scale restoration in the northwest Wisconsin pine barrens. Restor Ecol 8:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI (2005) Rural and suburban sprawl in the US Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney TP, Wiegmann SM, Rogers DA, Waller DM (2004) Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conserv Biol 18:787–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2002) Understory species patterns and diversity in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests. Ecol Appl 12:1329–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2005) A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA. Global Change Biol 11:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2001) The original US public land survey records: their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. J Forest 49:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ, Nordheim EV (2002) Quantitative classification of a historic northern Wisconsin (USA) landscape: mapping forests at regional scales. Can J For Res 32:1616–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Pidgeon AM, Mladenoff DJ (2005) One hundred fifty years of change in forest bird breeding habitat: estimates of species distributions. Conserv Biol 19:1944–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns F, Likens GE (2002) One hundred years of recovery of a pine forest in northern Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 148:2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart LO (1935) Public land surveys: history, instructions, methods. Collegiate Press, Ames, IA, USA, 202 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Guzy M, Lefsky MA, VanTuyl S, Sun O, Daly C, Law BE (2003) Effects of land use and fine-scale environmental heterogeneity on net ecosystem production over a temperate coniferous forest landscape. Tellus B-Chem Phys Meteorol 55:657–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann JE, Howard SM, Yang LM, Larson CR, Wylie BK, Van Driel N (2001) Completion of the 1990s national land cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photo Eng Remote Sens 67:650–652

    Google Scholar 

  • WAI [Working for America Institute] (2003) U.S. forestry industry and its workers: seeing the forests and the trees. Working for America Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 14 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • White MA, Mladenoff DJ (1994) Old-growth forest landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landscape Ecol 9:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse JL (2001) A comparison of leaf litter spider assemblages in old growth and managed forests. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay

  • Whitney GG (1987) An ecological history of the Great Lakes forest of Michigan. J Ecol 75:667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (1989) Americans and their forests: a historical geography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 599 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2003) Deforesting the earth: from prehistory to global crisis. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 715 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods KD (2000) Long-term change and spatial pattern in a late successional hemlock-northern hardwood forest. J Ecol 88:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QF, Pregitzer KS, Reed DD (2000) Historical changes in the forests of the Luce District of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Am Midl Nat 143:94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the USDA Forest Service Eastern Region, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, Iowa State University, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. We thank C. Canham, J. Foley, D. Foster, C. Lorimer, T. Spies, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this paper that improved its quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, 339 Science II, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Lisa A. Schulte & Laura C. Merrick

  2. Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    David J. Mladenoff

  3. USDA Forest Service Wildlife, Fish, Air and Water Research, Washington, DC, 20090, USA

    Thomas R. Crow

  4. USDA Forest Service Eastern Region and Southern Research Station, Rhinelander, WI, 54501, USA

    David T. Cleland

Authors
  1. Lisa A. Schulte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Mladenoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas R. Crow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura C. Merrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David T. Cleland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Schulte.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9112-8

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulte, L.A., Mladenoff, D.J., Crow, T.R. et al. Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use. Landscape Ecol 22, 1089–1103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9095-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9095-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation