Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of intracolony variability in behavioral development on plasticity of division of labor in honey bee colonies

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a genetic component to plasticity in age polyethism in honey bee colonies, such that workers of some genotypes become precocious foragers more readily than do workers of other genotypes, in colonies lacking older bees. Using colonies composed of workers from two identifiable genotype groups, we determined that intracolony differences in the likelihood of becoming a precocious forager are a consequence of differences in rates of behavioral development that are also evident under conditions leading to normal development. An alternative hypothesis, that differences in the likelihood of becoming a precocious forager are due to differences in general sensitivity to altered colony conditions, was not supported. In three out of three trials, workers from the genotype group that was more likely to exhibit precocious foraging in single cohort colonies also foraged at relatively younger ages in colonies in which workers exhibited normal behavioral development. In contrast, in three out of three trials, workers from the genotype group that was more likely to exhibit precocious foraging in single-cohort colonies did not show disproportionately more overaged nursing in colonies in which workers exhibited delayed development. These results indicate that genotypic differences in plasticity in age-related division of labor are based on genotypic differences in rates of behavioral development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bühlmann G (1985) Assessing population dynamics in a honey bee colony. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 312–316

  • Calabi P, Traniello JFA (1989) Behavioral flexibility in age castes of the ant Pheidole dentata. J Insect Behav 2:663–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW, Page RE (1988) Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins AM, Rothenbuhler WC (1978) Laboratory test of the response to an alarm chemical, isopentyl acetate, by Apis mellifera. Ann Ent Soc Am 71:906–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Page RE (1985) On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda H (1983) The relationship between work efficiency and population size in a honeybee colony. Res Pop Ecol 25:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z-Y, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: Worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11726–11729

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z-Y Robinson GE, Tobe SS, Yagi KJ, Strambi C, Strambi A, Stay B (1991) Hormonal regulation of behavioural development in the honey bee is based on changes in the rate of juvenile hormone biosynthesis. J Insect Physiol 37:733–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes SA, Winston ML, Fergusson LA (1989) The division of labor among worker honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): the effects of multiple patrilines. J Kan Entomol Soc 62:80–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A (1987) Factors determining polyethism in social insects. Experientia 54:219–241 (Suppl)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Southwick EE (1992) Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE (1986) Sperm utilization in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:297–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Erickson EH (1988) Reproduction by worker honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE (1991) The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. Adv Insect Physiol 23:117–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE, Britton DS, Fondrk MK (1992) Genotypic variability for rates of behavioral development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol 3:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Pop Biol 21:171–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1990) The evolution of polyandry by queens in social Hymenoptera: The significance of the timing of removal of diploid males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1987a) Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1987b) Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labor based on hormonally regulated response thresholds. J Comp Physiol A 160:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi C, Strambi A (1989) Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science 246:109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Page RE, Fondrk MK (1990) Intracolonial behavioral variation in worker oviposition, oophagy, and larval care in queenless honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26: 315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi C, Strambi A (1992) Colony integration in honey bees: Mechanisms of behavioral reversion. Ethology 90:336–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF (1953) Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung in einem Zwergvolk der Honigbienen. Beiträge zur Biologie des Bienenvolkes, Apis mellifera L. I. Jpn J Zool 11:117–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharloo W (1989) Developmental and physiological aspects of reaction norms. Drosophila data link genetic variation and phenotypic response to the environment. BioScience 39:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) Honey bee ecology: a study in adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Kolmes SA (1991) Age polyethism for hive duties in honey bees — illusion or reality? Ethology 87:284–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Towne WF (1992) Tactics of dance choice in honey bees: do foragers compare dances? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1989) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Phenotypic sources of variation among organisms can be described by developmental switches and reaction norms. BioScience 39:436–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker KW (1986) Visible mutants. In: Rinderer TE (ed) Bee genetics and breeding. Academic Press, New York, pp 57–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML, Katz SJ (1982) Foraging differences between cross-fostered honeybee workers (Apis mellifera) of European and Africanized races. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:125–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giray, T., Robinson, G.E. Effects of intracolony variability in behavioral development on plasticity of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 13–20 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167054

Key words

Navigation