PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Michael Nute
AU  - Ehsan Saleh
AU  - Tandy Warnow
TI  - Benchmarking Statistical Multiple Sequence Alignment
AID  - 10.1101/304659
DP  - 2018 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 304659
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/20/304659.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/20/304659.full
AB  - The estimation of multiple sequence alignments of protein sequences is a basic step in many bioinformatics pipelines, including protein structure prediction, protein family identification, and phylogeny estimation. Statistical co-estimation of alignments and trees under stochastic models of sequence evolution has long been considered the most rigorous technique for estimating alignments and trees, but little is known about the accuracy of such methods on biological benchmarks. We report the results of an extensive study evaluating the most popular protein alignment methods as well as the statistical co-estimation method BAli-Phy on 1192 protein data sets from established benchmarks as well as on 120 simulated data sets. Our study (which used more than 230 CPU years for the BAli-Phy analyses alone) shows that BAli-Phy is dramatically more accurate than the other alignment methods on the simulated data sets, but is among the least accurate on the biological benchmarks. There are several potential causes for this discordance, including model misspecification, errors in the reference alignments, and conflicts between structural alignment and evolutionary alignments; future research is needed to understand the most likely explanation for our observations. multiple sequence alignment, BAli-Phy, protein sequences, structural alignment, homology