PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Taylor Bolt
AU  - Jason S. Nomi
AU  - Danilo Bzdok
AU  - Lucina Q. Uddin
TI  - Historical and cross-disciplinary trends in the biological and social sciences reveal an accelerating adoption of advanced analytics
AID  - 10.1101/2020.12.02.408989
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.12.02.408989
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/03/2020.12.02.408989.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/03/2020.12.02.408989.full
AB  - Methods for data analysis in the biomedical, life and social sciences are developing at a rapid pace. At the same time, there is increasing concern that education in quantitative methods is failing to adequately prepare students for contemporary research. These trends have led to calls for educational reform to undergraduate and graduate quantitative research method curricula. We argue that such reform should be based on data-driven insights into within- and cross-disciplinary use of research methods. Our survey of peer-reviewed literature screened ∼3.5 million openly available research articles to monitor the cross-disciplinary usage of research methods in the past decade. We applied data-driven text-mining analyses to the methods and materials section of a large subset of this corpus to identify method trends shared across disciplines, as well as those unique to each discipline. As a whole, usage of T-test, analysis of variance, and other classical regression-based methods has declined in the published literature over the past 10 years. Machine-learning approaches, such as artificial neural networks, have seen a significant increase in the total share of scientific publications. We find unique groupings of research methods associated with each biomedical, life and social science discipline, such as the use of structural equation modeling in psychology, survival models in oncology, and manifold learning in ecology. We discuss the implications of these findings for education in statistics and research methods, as well as within- and cross-disciplinary collaboration.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.