Summary
Predator-prey interactions are a core concept of animal ecology and functional response models provide a powerful tool to predict the strength of trophic links and assess motives for prey choice. However, due to their reductionist set-up, these models may not display field conditions, possibly leading to skewed results.
We tested the validity of functional response models for multiple prey by comparing them with empirical data from DNA-based molecular gut content analysis of two abundant and widespread macrofauna soil predators, lithobiid and geophilomorph centipedes.
We collected soil and litter dwelling centipedes, screened their gut contents for DNA of nine abundant decomposer and intraguild prey using specific primers and tested for different prey and predator traits explaining prey choice. In order to calculate the functional response of same predators, we used natural prey abundances and functional response parameters from published experiments and compared both approaches.
Molecular gut content results showed that prey choice of centipedes is driven by predator body size and prey identity. Results of functional response models significantly correlated with results from molecular gut content analysis for the majority of prey species.
Overall, the results suggest that functional response models are a powerful tool to predict trophic interactions in soil, however, species-specific traits have to be taken into account to improve predictions.