New Results
Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms
Thomas LaBar, View ORCID ProfileChristoph Adami
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/049767
Thomas LaBar
1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
2Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior Program, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
3BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
Christoph Adami
1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
2Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior Program, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
3BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America
Article usage
Posted April 22, 2016.
Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms
Thomas LaBar, Christoph Adami
bioRxiv 049767; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/049767
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11715)
- Bioengineering (8723)
- Bioinformatics (29129)
- Biophysics (14936)
- Cancer Biology (12049)
- Cell Biology (17359)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9406)
- Ecology (14144)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18268)
- Genetics (12221)
- Genomics (16767)
- Immunology (11843)
- Microbiology (28014)
- Molecular Biology (11560)
- Neuroscience (60814)
- Paleontology (450)
- Pathology (1864)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3231)
- Physiology (4940)
- Plant Biology (10384)
- Synthetic Biology (2878)
- Systems Biology (7333)
- Zoology (1642)