New Results
Bias and measurement error in comparative analyses: a case study with the Ornstein Uhlenbeck model
Gavin H. Thomas, Natalie Cooper, Chris Venditti, Andrew Meade, Rob P. Freckleton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/004036
Gavin H. Thomas
1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK,
Natalie Cooper
2School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland and Trinity Centre for Biodiversity Research, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland,
Chris Venditti
3School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6BX, UK,
Andrew Meade
4School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6BX, UK,
Rob P. Freckleton
5Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK,
Article usage
Posted April 15, 2015.
Bias and measurement error in comparative analyses: a case study with the Ornstein Uhlenbeck model
Gavin H. Thomas, Natalie Cooper, Chris Venditti, Andrew Meade, Rob P. Freckleton
bioRxiv 004036; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/004036
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11736)
- Bioengineering (8746)
- Bioinformatics (29186)
- Biophysics (14964)
- Cancer Biology (12084)
- Cell Biology (17401)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9418)
- Ecology (14176)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18299)
- Genetics (12235)
- Genomics (16793)
- Immunology (11863)
- Microbiology (28066)
- Molecular Biology (11580)
- Neuroscience (60925)
- Paleontology (451)
- Pathology (1870)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3238)
- Physiology (4956)
- Plant Biology (10422)
- Synthetic Biology (2883)
- Systems Biology (7338)
- Zoology (1650)