New Results
Retrieval-extinction within the memory reconsolidation window does not influence appetitive choice
Akram Bakkour, Tom Schonberg, Ashleigh M. Hover, Russell A. Poldrack
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/014316
Akram Bakkour
aImaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 East 24th Street R9975, Austin, Texas 78712
bcurrent address: Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027
Tom Schonberg
aImaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 East 24th Street R9975, Austin, Texas 78712
ccurrent address: Department of Neurobiology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
Ashleigh M. Hover
aImaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 East 24th Street R9975, Austin, Texas 78712
Russell A. Poldrack
aImaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 East 24th Street R9975, Austin, Texas 78712
dcurrent address: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Bldg. 420, Jordan Hall, Stanford, CA 94305
Article usage
Posted January 24, 2015.
Retrieval-extinction within the memory reconsolidation window does not influence appetitive choice
Akram Bakkour, Tom Schonberg, Ashleigh M. Hover, Russell A. Poldrack
bioRxiv 014316; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/014316
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11703)
- Bioengineering (8722)
- Bioinformatics (29127)
- Biophysics (14932)
- Cancer Biology (12048)
- Cell Biology (17359)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9406)
- Ecology (14143)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18268)
- Genetics (12220)
- Genomics (16766)
- Immunology (11841)
- Microbiology (28005)
- Molecular Biology (11552)
- Neuroscience (60808)
- Paleontology (450)
- Pathology (1864)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3231)
- Physiology (4939)
- Plant Biology (10384)
- Synthetic Biology (2877)
- Systems Biology (7333)
- Zoology (1642)