Abstract
Intestinal carriage of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is a frequent, increasing and worrying phenomenon, but little is known about the molecular scenario and the evolutionary forces at play. We screened 45 veal calves, known to have high prevalence of carriage, for ESBL-producing E. coli on 514 rectal swabs (one randomly selected colony per sample) collected over six months. We characterized the bacterial clones and plasmids carrying blaESBL genes with a combination of genotyping methods, whole genome sequencing and conjugation assays. One hundred and seventy-three ESBL-producing E. coli isolates [blaCTX-M-1 (64.7%), blaCTX-M-14 (33.5%) or blaCTX-M-15 (1.8%)] were detected, belonging to 32 bacterial clones, mostly of phylogroup A. Calves were colonized successively by different clones with a trend in decreasing carriage. The persistence of a clone in a farm was significantly associated with the number of calves colonized. Despite a high diversity of E. coli clones and blaCTX-M-carrying plasmids, few blaCTX-M gene/plasmid/chromosomal background combinations dominated, due to (i) efficient colonization of bacterial clones and/or (ii) successful plasmid spread in various bacterial clones. The scenario ‘clone vs. plasmid spread’ depended on the farm. Thus, epistatic interactions between resistance genes, plasmids and bacterial clones contribute to optimize fitness in specific environments.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
erick.denamur{at}inserm.fr, marisa.haenni{at}anses.fr, jean-yves.madec{at}anses.fr, meril.massot{at}inserm.fr
Competing interests This work was supported in part by grants from La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale to M.M. (grant number FDM20150633309) and E.D. (équipe FRM 2016, grant number DEQ20161136698), and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No. 773830 (Project ARDIG, EJP One Health) and INTERBEV (Protocol N° SECU-15-31). The funding organizations were not involved in the study design, or collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or writing of the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.