Abstract
While the transcriptional code governing retinal ganglion cell (RGC) type specification begins to be understood, its interplay with neurotrophic signaling is largely unexplored. Using sparse random recombination, we show that mosaic gene dosage manipulation of the transcription factor Brn3a/Pou4f1 in neurotrophic receptor Ret heterozygote RGCs results in altered cell fate decisions and/or morphological dendritic defects. Specific RGC types are lost if Brn3a is ablated during embryogenesis and only mildly affected by postnatal Brn3a ablation. Sparse but not complete Brn3a heterozygosity combined with complete Ret heterozygosity has striking effects on RGC type distribution. Brn3a only mildly modulates Ret transcription, while Ret knockouts exhibit normal Brn3a and Brn3b expression. However, Brn3a loss of function significantly affects distribution of Ret co-receptors GFRα1-3, and neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkC in RGCs. Based on these observations, we propose that Brn3a and Ret converge onto developmental pathways that control RGC type specification, potentially through a competitive mechanism requiring signaling from the surrounding tissue.
1. Introduction
Retinal Ganglion Cells (RGCs) – the output neurons of the vertebrate retina – relay visual information to distinct projection areas in the brain. Currently, mouse RGCs are subdivided into about 50 types based on classification criteria including morphological, functional, and molecular parameters 1–10. The developmental mechanisms orchestrating the differentiation of RGC types involve transcription factors (TFs) in combination with extracellular signaling. Within the retina, Atoh7/Math5 11–13 is required but not sufficient for neuronal precursors to commit to the RGC fate. Downstream of Atoh7, postmitotic TFs determine general traits of neuronal morphology and functional characteristics – in RGCs this group includes the three members of the Pou4f family, namely Pou4f1/Brn3a, Pou4f2/Brn3b, and Pou4f3/Brn3c 2,14–20. Pou4f/Brn3 TFs are expressed in the retina specifically in RGCs. Brn3a transcription is initiated somewhat later than Brn3b (embryonic day 13.5 – E13.5 vs embryonic day 11.5 – E11.5), acts downstream of Brn3b in the developmental transcriptional program, and was initially considered to function redundantly with Brn3b21.
Deletion of Brn3a in mice leads to early postnatal lethality caused by somatosensory system and brainstem nuclei abnormalities, with no gross perturbations in the retina at this stage of development19,22. Using a conditional alkaline phosphatase (AP) reporter allele knocked-in to the Brn3a locus (Brn3aCKOAP) we demonstrated that Brn3a-expressing RGCs laminate in the outer strata (~70%) of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the retina. Loss of Brn3a before the actual onset of locus expression results in a shift towards bistratified arbor morphologies and general decrease of RGC numbers by approximately 30% 2,14,17. This reduction is mostly explained by a loss of RGCs with small dendritic arbor areas and dense multistratified lamination pattern – ON and OFF β RGCs. RNA deep sequencing of affinity-purified early postnatal Brn3aAP/KO (effectively Brn3a null = Brn3aKO/KO) RGCs revealed potential transcriptional targets for Brn3a regulation of cell type development 9,23. However, at what developmental stage Brn3a is necessary for specification of ON and OFF β RGCs still remains unexplored.
Amongst the neurotrophic cues required for neuronal development and specification, target derived neurotrophin (NT) and glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) families of ligands play a major role. Components of receptor complexes for NTs contain members of distinct molecular families such as Trk, p75NTR and sortilin 24–27. Neurotrophin receptors are also expressed in rodent RGCs during development 9,28 and development of dendrites and axons and physiological maturation of RGC is modulated by neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and neurotrophin receptors, TrkB and p75NTR 29–37. Not much is known about the effects of Glial family ligands (GFLs) and their receptors in RGC development and specification. The GDNF family of neurotrophins contains four members – GDNF, artemin, neurturin, and persephin. Four co-receptors, “GDNF family receptor-α” (GFRα 1-4) attached to the cell membrane through a Glycosyl Phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor have selective affinity to the four ligands 38–41. The tyrosine kinase Ret co-receptor is required for downstream signaling through GFRα. Ret ablation phenotype is characterized by dramatic abnormalities of kidney formation, severely affected sympathetic ganglia, and defects in specific pain and touch somatosensory receptor cells, and megacolon (Hirschsprung disease) due to defects in the specification and migration of cells of the enteric nervous system 42–47. GFRα1, GFRα2 and Ret are expressed in RGC subpopulations, however, no RGC phenotypes were reported in Ret or GFR mutants. Ret and Neurturin mutants affect photoreceptor light responses and lead to morphological defects of photoreceptors, bipolar and horizontal cell contacts in the outer plexiform layer 48. Ret is dynamically expressed in specific retinal cell populations, beginning with RGCs (E13 – 14.5), followed by Horizontal (E17) and Amacrine (P1) cells 49–51. In the adult retina, Ret is co-expressed with Brn3a predominantly in three mono- and two bistratified subtypes of RGCs, with Brn3b – in four mono- and two bistratified subtypes, and with Brn3c – in a single monostratified subpopulation. Of interest, Brn3a and Ret are co-expressed in ON and OFF β RGCs 51.
In the current study, we use a RetCreERt2 allele to induce sparse random recombination in Cre-dependent histochemical reporters targeted at the Brn3a and Rosa26 loci, to visualize RGC dendritic arbor morphologies in sparse or complete double heterozygote (RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT) retinas at different developmental stages. In addition, we reveal the effects of knocking out Brn3a at important developmental timepoints on RGC subtype distribution. Finally, using immunostaining in Ret or Brn3a complete retinal knock-outs, we assess the potential crosstalk between transcriptional and neurotrophic mechanisms in RGCs. We find that Brn3a is required for the development of at least two monostratified RGC subtypes during embryonic and perinatal stages. However, the most striking finding is the specific effect of embryonic sparse double-heterozygosity on cell type specification in mono- and bistratified RGCs and on dendritic morphology in a subset of bistratified RGCs.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mouse lines and crosses
Mouse lines carrying Rosa26iAP52, Brn3aKO19, Brn3aCKOAP14, RetCreERt244, Rax:Cre 53 and RetCKCFP47 alleles were previously described. In the Brn3aKO allele, the entire open reading frame of Brn3a is deleted and replaced with a Neo cassette. Brn3aKO/KO mice are perinatal lethal, while Brn3aKO/WT mice are viable and breed normally 19. In the Brn3aCKOAP allele the two coding exons of Brn3a are appended with a (3x SV40) transcriptional STOP and flanked by loxP sites 14 and the cDNA of the histochemical reporter Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) is inserted after the 3’ loxP site. Cre mediated recombination results in ablation of the Brn3a ORF coupled with expression of the AP cDNA under the control of the endogenous regulatory elements of the Brn3a locus. The Rosa26iAP reporter locus expresses AP ubiquitously in a Cre dependent manner 52. The RetCKCFP conditional minigene allele includes the complete human Ret cDNA flanked by loxP sites knocked-in into exon 1 of the mouse Ret gene and followed by the Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) cDNA47. The unrecombined locus expresses the full human Ret ORF, while Cre mediated recombination ablates Ret, and replaces it with CFP, generating a Ret null allele. The BAC transgenic mouse line Rax:Cre contains Cre recombinase controlled by the mouse Rax gene locus 53, and expresses Cre in the anterior eye field, beginning with E9. The RetCreERt2 allele contains the CreERt2 (tamoxifen-dependent Cre activity) coding sequence knocked-in in the first exon of the Ret gene 44, resulting in a Ret null allele.
To understand the cell-autonomous effects of losing one or both copies of Brn3a at different time points from Ret+ RGCs, we have crossed RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT males x Brn3aCKOAP/CKOAP females resulting in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/KO pups. To achieve random sparse recombination and AP expression, we induced Cre recombinase by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT) at postnatal day 22 (P22 – adult, 50-100 μg 4-HT), postnatal day 0 (P0 pups, 2.5-5 μg 4-HT), or at embryonic day 15 (E15 embryos, delivered i.p. to the mother, 250 μg 4-HT) (Figure 1 a, b). To study the effects of complete double-heterozygosity (Brn3aKO/WT; RetKO/WT) on RGC dendritic morphology, we crossed RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT males x ROSA26AP/AP females to get RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT; ROSA26AP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aWT/WT; ROSA26AP/WT pups. Cre recombination and AP expression were induced by i.p. injections of 4-HT to the mother at E15 (250 μg 4-HT, Figure 1 c, d). For each genotype, and age of 4HT treatment, retinas from at least three animals were analyzed at two months after injection, with the exception of P0 induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice, where only two animals were analyzed.
To study potential transcriptional regulation of Brn3a via Ret signaling we crossed Rax:Cre; RetCKCFP/WT males x RetCKCFP/CKCFP females resulting in Rax:Cre; RetCKCFP/WT (full-retina Ret-heterozygote) and Rax:Cre; RetCKCFP/CKCFP (full-retina Ret-knockout) offspring (Figure 7). To study potential Brn3a transcriptional regulation of Ret, GFRα and Trk receptors, we crossed Rax:Cre; Brn3aKO/WT males x Brn3aCKOAP/CKOAP females to get Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/WT (full-retina Brn3a-heterozygote) and Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/KO (full-retina Brn3a-knockout) offspring (Figure 7–9). For these experiments, tissues were harvested from mice of both sexes, between two and four months of age.
All mice were on C57/Bl6-SV129 mixed background. All animal procedures were approved by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol NEI640.
2.2. AP histochemistry and morphometric analysis
Mouse retinas were stained, processed, and imaged, and RGC dendritic arbors were traced and quantified as described previously 1,51,54. Animals were anesthetized and fixed by intracardiac perfusion with 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA). Retinas were dissected and flat mounted, heat inactivated in a water bath at 65°C for one hour, and then AP histochemical stain developed. Color images of retina whole mounts and DIC grayscale image stacks (at 1 μm z step) of individual RGC dendritic arbors were captured with a Zeiss Imager.Z2. Morphological characteristics were measured using ImageJ software as described in Figure 3 and references 1,51. Relative lamination levels of dendritic arbors in the IPL were described by the lamination measurements in Figures 3, 5 and 6, and oriented by the previously reported stratification levels of ON and OFF Starburst Amacrine Cells (SACs) and the borderline between ON and OFF sublaminae of the IPL, as inferred from the lamination of axon terminals of ON bipolar cells 55. Neuronal reconstructions were made using Neuromantic (Darren Myat, http://www.reading.ac.uk/neuromantic) and projections were generated using a Matlab (Mathworks, Inc.) script 17. For each genotype combination and condition, at least three mice were analyzed.
2.3. Indirect immunofluorescence
Retina vertical sections were processed and immunostained as previously described 14,17,51. In brief, retinas were fixed for 30 min in 2% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected in OCT, and sectioned at 14 μm thickness on a cryostat. For each genotype, retinas from at least three different animals were sectioned and stained together on the same slide. Images (40x) were acquired using a Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope and Zen software. Number of analyzed retinas and collected images are indicated in legend of Figure 7. Antibodies and dilutions used for analysis: 1:50 rabbit polyclonal anti-Brn3b generated in our lab 51; 1:20 mouse monoclonal anti-Brn3a (Millipore, MAB1585, RRID: AB_94166, clone 5A3.2; 20; 1:25 rabbit polyclonal anti-Ret (IBL, cat # R787); 1:50 mouse monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (VEB Gent, Belgium, E6 clone); 1:40 goat polyclonal anti-TrkA (R&D Systems, AF1056); 1:40 goat polyclonal anti-TrkB (R&D Systems, AF1494); 1:40 goat polyclonal anti-TrkC (R&D Systems, AF1404); 1:20 goat polyclonal anti-GFRα1 (R&D Systems, AF560-SP); 1:100 goat polyclonal anti-GFRα2 (R&D Systems, AF429); 1:40 goat polyclonal anti-GFRα3 (R&D Systems, AF2645); 1:1000 chicken anti-GFP (used for detection of CFP protein; Abcam, ab13970, RRID: AB_300798). Alexa-Fluor conjugated Donkey polyclonal secondary antibodies were from Molecular Probes/Life Sciences and used at 1:300 dilution.
2.4. Statistical Methods
For RGC type distributions (Figures 2–6), data was collected from retinas from multiple animals for each treatment and genotype, and total numbers of measured cells are indicated in pie chart summaries in Figures 3, 5, and 6 and ranged from 90 to more than 300. Differences in cell type distribution were assessed using the Chi-square method, and Chi Statistics and P values indicated in supplementary table 1. For Indirect Immunofluorescence Experiments (Figures 7–9), data was collected from at least three animals, and cells were counted in 7 – 20 images for each genotype. Total numbers of measured cells are indicated in pie charts. Individual comparisons between groups of interest were performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS2) test, and comparisons of marker distributions between different genotypes were assessed with the Chi-square method. All statistical parameters are indicated in Supplementary table 2.
3. Results
3.1. Ret and Brn3a co-expression changes dramatically during RGC development
We had previously demonstrated that ablation of Brn3a before the onset of its expression (E12), results in essentially complete loss of RGC types with small dense dendritic arbors (betta ON and OFF or “midget-like” RGCs), while other Brn3a+ RGC types are only modestly affected 2,14,17. ON and OFF β RGCs, alongside several other cell types, are labelled when sparse random recombination is induced in adult RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice 51. To explore the time points at which Brn3a is required for betta RGC development, we induced random sparse recombination in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/KO and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice at E15, P0 and P22 to generate either isolated RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/KO RGCs in a RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT retinal background or RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT RGCs in a RetKO/WT; Brn3aWT/WT retinal background (Figure 1 a, b, Figure 2 a – c1). In these experiments, the Brn3a gene dosages of labelled RGCs are different from the surrounding tissue. In order to study the effects of complete double heterozygosity of Ret and Brn3a (RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT) on RGC development, we induced random sparse recombination in either RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3a KO/WT; Rosa26AP/WT or RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3a WT/WT; Rosa26AP/WT mice. In these experiments, labelled RGCs and surrounding retina have the same genotype (either RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT or RetKO/WT; Brn3aWT/WT, Figure 1 c, d, Figure 6 a-a1).
As previously shown 51, Brn3a expression in adult retina predominantly intersects with Ret expression in five morphological RGC types – three monostratified (ON and OFFβ - “midget-like”, Figure 2 f-f2, and ON spiny, Figure 2 e-e2) and two bistratified (ON-OFF direction selective = ON-OFF-DS - Figure 4 a-a3, and Small Bistratified/Suppressed-by-contrast, henceforth SbC,, Figure 4 b-b3). In addition, isolated instances of several other monostratified cells, as well as a significant number of bistratified RGCs with recursive dendrites were observed (Figure 4, c-c3). A similar range of RGC types was observed when recombination was induced in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice at P0. However, the overall RGC type distribution changed dramatically when recombination was induced at E15. The ratio of monostratified:bistratified RGCs changed from ~33:66 % at P0 and P22 to 60:40 % at E15 (Figure 3 b-b2, Table 2). Two cell types, On-Alpha-Sustained = ONαS and Pixel Detectors (M5) (Figure 2 d-d2, g-g2), which are not observed in samples induced at P0 and P22, made up more than 50 % of monostratified cells (plots and pie-chart Figure 3 c-g, Table 2). Amongst E15-induced bistratified neurons, SbC morphologies were essentially missing, while three “novel” morphological types, not observed in the samples induced at P0 and P22 made up sizeable fractions of bistratified neurons (AT1, AT2, ON-Direction Selective = ON-DS, Figure 4 e-e3, g-g4, h-h4, Figure 5 a-f, Table 2). AT1 and AT2 are two unusual bistratified morphologies characterized by ON dendritic arbors which stratify in apposition to the GCL (normalized ID index is between ~0 and 0.2, where 0 is GCL level, Figure 5 a, b, left panels), while their OFF dendritic arbors laminate close to the INL (Figure 5 a, c, left panels). In the case of AT1, the OFF arbor is relatively simple and derives in most cases via a single branch straight from the cell body. However, AT2 bistratified neurons have a thicker OFF dendritic arbor (in z dimension) (Figure 5 a, c left plots), which can be occasionally resolved into two sub-arbors, creating the impression of a tri-stratified neuron (Figure 4 h-h4). Morphologies similar to AT2 were recovered by random sparse recombination in wild type retina (Badea et al 2004,1 Figure 15 a), and resemble cell type 85 in the serially reconstructed dataset in the Eyewire Museum (http//www.museum.eyewire.org). However, we are not aware of any instances of AT1 morphologies in either repositories or previous literature. Four of the five cell types which are unique to the RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGC population induced at E15 (ONαS, M5, AT1, AT2), were never previously observed in sparsely labelled Brn3aAP/WT RGCs 2,14,17,51. In addition, the ON dendritic arbors of these 4 cell types are laminated within the IPL in close proximity to the GCL, a sublamina that is typically not labelled when dendritic arbors of the entire Brn3aAP/WT RGC population are labelled by E9.5 recombination (14,17,23 and Figure 7a). The fifth, ON-DS, is, based on dendritic arbor areas and lamination, most likely the ON-DS RGC, which is known to occasionally have smaller branches co-stratifying with the OFF ChAT band, and has been recorded in early embryonic induced samples (2,14,17, Figure 4 e-e3, Figure 5 left side). Thus, it appears that a subset of E15 induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGCs constitute a distinct RGC subpopulation that typically does not usually express Brn3a or exhibits morphological differences from previously described Brn3a+ RGCs.
3.2. Loss of ON and OFF betta and ON spiny RGCs in Brn3a-cKO retinas after embryonic and perinatal Cre induction
We then analyzed subpopulations of Brn3aKO/KO RGCs generated by inducing sparse recombination at E15, P0, and P22 (adult). When recombination was induced in the adult, type distribution of RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO (i.e. RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/KO) RGCs was indistinguishable from that of RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT (i.e. RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT cells (Figure 3 b2, c-g1, Figure 5 a-f1, right-most pie charts and scatter plots, Table 2). Monostratified:Bistratified ratios were nearly identical (Figure 3 b2, Table 2), and the frequencies of individual mono- and bistratified RGC types was not significantly different (Figure 3 g-g1, Figure 5 f-f1, right-most pie charts and scatter plots, Table 3). However, when recombination was induced at P0 - resulting in random sparse Brn3a loss of function soon after birth - the distributions of RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGC types showed significant differences (Figure 3 b1, c-g1, Table 2, Table 3). The relative abundance of ON and OFFβ RGCs decreased considerably, and ON-Spiny neurons were completely missing (Figure 3 c-g1, middle plots and pie-charts), resulting in an overall decrease in monostratified RGC morphologies (Figure 3 b1, Table 2). Additionally, we identified amongst RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs induced at either P22 or P0 a minor subpopulation of RGCs with morphologies reminiscent of betta RGCs, but exhibiting somewhat larger areas and sparser dendritic arbors (Brn3aKO-specific betta RGC = Brn3aKO-β, Figure 2 h-h2, Figure 3c1-g1, middle and right scatter plots and pie charts).
RGCs with ON and OFF β and ON Spiny morphologies are also underrepresented amongst RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs induced at E15, when compared to RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT control RGCs (Figure 3 c-g1, left plots and pie-charts, Table 2) while the relative ratios of ONαS and Pixel Detector (M5) RGCs are not significantly affected by complete loss of Brn3a (Figure 3 c-g1, Table 2). These shifts in cell type distribution result in a net reduction of the mono:bistratified ratio in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs induced at E15 compared to controls. (Figure 3 b, g-g1 left pie-charts, Table 2).
3.3. Effect of Brn3a loss of function on bistratified RGCs
In our previous work, we had reported a moderate effect of Brn3a ablation on bistratified RGC morphology. Here we use sparse random recombination in the RetCreERt2; Brn3aCKOAP intersection to study the effect of Brn3a ablation on bistratified RGCs at several developmental stages. Bistratified RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGC types did not differ significantly when sparse random recombination was induced at either P0 or P22 (Figure 5, a-f1, middle and right plots and pie-charts, Table 2). The majority of bistratified RGCs labeled belonged to the ON-OFF DS, SbC, and Recursive Bistratified types. A few examples of Large Bistratified RGCs (LB, Figure 4 d-d3) were also observed specifically amongst P0 and P22 RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs (Figure 5 a-f1, right plots and pie-charts). In addition, in P0 induced recombinations, a few instances of a Brn3aKO-specific subpopulation were recovered. These cells exhibit a simplified ON arbor from which relatively simple straight branches descend and form small tufts into the OFF lamina (Figure 4 f-f3, Figure 5 a1-e1 middle plots), and resemble the ones previously described in early sparse recombination experiments 2. The AT1 and AT2 morphologies are observed in the dataset induced at E15 in both RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs with comparable frequencies (Figure 5, f-f1, left pie-charts, Table 2).
3.4. Early Complete (RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT) double heterozygosity does not affect RGC type distribution
Ret expression in the retina changes significantly between embryonic, postnatal and adult stages of development 51. We had previously described the RGC type distribution in RetCreERt2/WT; ROSA26AP/WT mice in which random sparse recombination was induced at P14 and adult 51. Is the dramatic shift in Ret+ Brn3a+ RGC types observed in E15 random sparse recombination due to developmental differences of expression intrinsic to the Ret locus? Alternatively, are the shifts in RGC types due to a genetic interaction between Brn3a and Ret in the double heterozygote mice? To answer these questions, we induced random sparse recombination in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT; ROSA26AP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aWT/WT; ROSA26AP/WT mice at E15 and analyzed RGC type distribution in adult (>P60) mice (Figure 1 c, d, Figure 6 a). The ratio between mono- and bistratified RGCs is similar in complete Brn3aWT/WT and complete Brn3aKO/WT retinas (Figure 6 b) and the distribution of monostratified RGC types induced at E15 in RetCreERt2/WT; ROSA26AP/WT mice was not affected by Brn3a dosage and resembled the RGC types identified in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice induced at the same age, with small variations in M5 and betta cell numbers (Figure 6 c, e-h, Table 2). However, bistratified RGCs induced at E15 in either RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aWT/WT; ROSA26AP/WT or RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT; ROSA26AP/WT backgrounds were restricted to the previously described major types (ON-OFF DS, SbC, Recursive, ON-DS and LB), and no instances of AT1 and AT2 RGCs were observed (Figure 6 d, i-m). This distribution is consistent with the one seen for RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT or RetCreERt2/WT; ROSA26AP/WT mice upon adult inductions. Thus, complete heterozygous Brn3a loss did not affect the pattern of Ret expression at E15. Moreover, the expression profile of Ret amongst RGC types, as measured by induction of RetCreERt2/WT in the background of the ROSA26AP/WT allele, does not change dramatically from E15 to adult (compare Figure 6 h, k to Parmhans 2018, 51, Figures 6 h and 7 c-d).
3.5. Regulatory crosstalk between Ret and Brn3a
The distinct effects of global versus sparse random manipulation of Brn3a dosage on RGC type distribution prompted us to ask whether Ret and Brn3a regulate each other at transcriptional level. We therefore checked for co-expression of Ret protein and the Alkaline phosphatase (AP) reporter in full-retina Brn3a-heterozygote (Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/WT) and full-retina Brn3a-knockout (Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/KO, Figure 7 a-d) sections. The distribution of Ret+, AP+ and Ret+AP+ (double-positive) cells is similar regardless of Brn3a dosage, with a modest (statistically insignificant) decrease of double-positive cells in Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/KO (Figure 7 b, c, Supplementary Table 2). Nevertheless, the overall shift from AP+Ret+ double positive cells to single AP+ or Ret+ positive cells in Brn3aKO retinas is statistically significant (χ2 ChiStat = 10.81, p = 0.013) potentially suggesting that Brn3a controls Ret in a subset of RGC types.
We then asked whether Ret signaling can regulate Brn3a or Brn3b transcription. Co-expression of the conditional knock-in reporter CFP with either Brn3a or Brn3b was compared in full-retina Ret-heterozygotes (Rax:Cre; RetCKCFP/WT) and full-retina Ret-knockouts (Rax:Cre RetCKCFP/CKCFP, Figure 7 e-h). In this line, the CFP reporter is expressed from the Ret locus after the removal of the Ret cDNA by Cre recombination 47. We observed RGCs expressing Ret either alone or in combination with Brn3a, Brn3b or both. The distribution of single, double and triple labelled cells is conserved in the two backgrounds (Figure 7 f, g, Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that Ret is not required for Brn3a or Brn3b expression in RGCs. Thus it is unlikely that the genetic interaction observed in sparsely recombined RGCs is mediated by reciprocal transcriptional control of Ret and Brn3a.
3.6. Does Brn3a modulate GDNF ligand signaling to RGCs by regulating GFRα Ret co-receptors?
We next asked whether GFRα Ret co-receptors are expressed in Brn3a+ RGCs and/or regulated by Brn3a. Data from a deep sequencing analysis screen of Brn3a transcriptional targets expressed in RGCs 9,23 shows that Ret and GFRα’s are expressed in RGCs at E15 and P3 (Supplementary Figure 1). While Ret expression levels are relatively high (some 20 FPKM), the co-receptors are expressed at much lower levels. The major GFRα1 transcript is mostly expressed in Brn3bAP RGCs at both E15 and P3 (around 5 FPKM), and somewhat less in Brn3aAP/WT RGCs at P3 (1.2 FPKM), and its expression is nearly doubled in Brn3aAP/KO RGCs, suggesting negative regulation by Brn3a. GFRα2 is homogeneously expressed across all Brn3AP RGCs at both E15 and P3 (about 4-6 FPKM), but is not regulated by Brn3a. GFRα3 is and GFRα4 are expressed at less than 1 FPKM in P3 Brn3AP RGCs and do not appear regulated by either Brn3 transcription factor (Sajgo 2017 and Supplementary Figure 1). Since adult GFRα expression had been previously reported in RGCs 48, we stained adult Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/WT and Rax:Cre; Brn3aCKOAP/KO retina sections with anti-GFRα1, GFRα2 and GFRα3 antibodies (Figure 8, Supplementary Table 2). When comparing Brn3aAP/WT to Brn3aAP/KO retinas (Figure 8, c-d, g-h, k-l Supplementary Table 2), loss of Brn3a results in significant increases in GFRα1+ - GFRα3+ GCL cells (18.8 to 25, 25.8 to 33.33 and 38.2 to 54 % DAPI+ cells in GCL, respectively). Consistent with previous reports, Brn3aAP RGCs numbers are reduced as a result of Brn3a ablation (26 to 18.8, 20.18 to 9 and 4.35 to 2.4 % DAPI+ cells in GCL, respectively), however GFRα1+ Brn3aAP and GFRα2+ Brn3aAP double positive ratios are not significantly affected (GFRα1+ Brn3aAP: 7.5 vs. 11.7 and GFRα2+ Brn3aAP: 12.7 vs 11.3 % DAPI+ cells in GCL). There is also a sizable but statistically insignificant decrease in GFRα3+ Brn3aAP RGCs. Overall, the partial overlap between all three GFRα receptors and Brn3aAP is significantly altered by Brn3a ablation (Figure 8 c, g, k), resulting in a shift away from Brn3aAP and towards GFRα expression. This shift could be caused by a fate change of Brn3aAP RGCs towards GFRα+ RGCs in Brn3aAP/KO retinas, since the ratios of GFRα+ Brn3aAP RGCs are not significantly changed. Interestingly, the antibody staining for both GFRα1+ and GFRα2+ reveals increased dendritic arbor labelling in close proximity to the GCL, suggesting that most GFRα1+ and GFRα2+ RGCs are laminating in the sublamina which is populated by the unusual RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT or RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGC types induced at E15 (ONαS, M5, AT1, AT2).
3.7. Does Brn3a transcriptionally regulate Trk family neurotrophic receptors in RGCs?
Brn3a regulation of Trk neurotrophin receptors is believed to play a major role in cell type specification of projection sensory neurons of the somatosensory (DRG and TGG), auditory and vestibular pathways, and the GDNF - GFRα and NGF – Trk neurotrophic signaling axes interact in cell type specification25,26,56. We therefore asked whether Trk receptor expression in RGCs is regulated by Brn3a. Our RNAseq data predicted that all three Trk receptors (TrkA/Ntrk1, TrkB/Ntrk2 and TrkC/Ntrk3) and p75/NGFr are expressed in RGCs at E15 and P3, and that Brn3a is positively regulating TrkA and TrkC and negatively regulating TrkB (9,23 and Supplementary Figure 2), while TrkB expression in adult mouse RGCs had been previously reported57. Using antibody staining in the adult retina, we find that TrkB is expressed in a large fraction of GCL cells, and a majority of Brn3aAP RGCs in both Brn3aAP/WT or Brn3aAP/KO retinas (Figure 9 e-h, Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, TrkA is partially co-expressed with Brn3a in a small fraction of RGCs, and the fraction of TrkA+ Brn3aAP RGCs is somewhat reduced in Brn3aAP/KO retinas (from 6.8 to 1.8 % DAPI+ cells in GCL, Figure 9 a – d, Supplementary Table 2). A majority of Brn3aAP RGCs expressed TrkC, and the number of TrkC+ Brn3aAP RGCs was mildly reduced by Brn3a ablation (from 34.6 to 28.5 % DAPI+ cells in GCL, Figure 9 i-l, Supplementary Table 2). While none of the individual cell population changes were statistically significant using the KS2 test, TrkA and TrkC vs. Brn3aAP populations were significantly shifted in Brn3aAP/WT vs Brn3aAP/KO retinas, as judged by the Chi-Square distribution test. These losses in TrkA+ Brn3aAP and TrkC+ Brn3aAP RGCs may be due either to direct transcriptional regulation of the two Trk receptors by Brn3a or by the loss of specific Brn3aAP RGC subpopulations due to Brn3a ablation. It is worth pointing out that TrkA dendritic arbors were distributed in three sharp lamina across the IPL, with the most intense one being apposed against the GCL, as seen for GFRα1+ and GFRα2+, while TrkC exhibited lamination in the OFF sublaminae of the IPL. All three Trk receptors are expressed in the GCL and the proximal INL, suggesting expression in Amacrine cells in addition to RGCs.
4. Discussion
Our results show that altering the dosage of Brn3a in a sparse mosaic fashion early (E15) in the development of Ret heterozygote (RetCreERt2/WT) RGCs can change the cell type distribution and/or morphologies of heterozygote (Brn3aAP/WT) and knockout (Brn3aAP/KO) RGCs. RGCs are not affected when Brn3a is removed in the adult, and mildly affected by Brn3a removal immediately after birth. E15 or P0 removal of both copies of Brn3a results in dramatic losses in midget and ON spiny RGCs, suggesting a significant role for Brn3a in the development of these cell populations. Germline double heterozygosity (RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT) does not phenocopy the results obtained with the mosaic heterozygotes and results in normal RGC type specification. Immunohistochemical evidence collected in whole retina knockouts of either Ret or Brn3a shows a modest transcriptional control of Ret by Brn3a while neither Brn3a nor Brn3b are affected by complete retinal loss of Ret. However full retinal loss of Brn3a results in significant shifts in expression of Ret co-receptors GFRα1-3 in the GCL and mildly reduces neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkC expression in Brn3aAP RGCs. Thus, the simplest explanation of our data is that Ret and Brn3a participate in parallel developmental pathways that converge onto RGC type specification at the early stages of postmitotic development, and potentially use a competitive mechanism based on gene dosage. The range of RGC types reported in this study was largely similar with previous reports, and equivalencies to previously reported anatomies, including a serial EM dataset (EyeWire museum)4 are provided in table 1.
Brn3a requirement in early versus late RGC development
Brn3a is required for the development of ON and OFF β RGCs and some bistratified RGC types, and Brn3a KO animals have a net RGC loss of about 30 % 2,14,17,51. Ablating either Brn3a, Brn3b or both in adult mice does not affect RGC numbers up to six months post ablation 58. We now show that adult ablation of Brn3a does not significantly alter the cell type distribution of Ret+ Brn3a+ RGCs, while complete loss of Brn3a at P0 and E15 produces a significant overall shift in RGC type distribution between RetCreERt2/WT Brn3aAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT Brn3aAP/KO RGCs, largely based on the dramatic loss of ON and OFF β RGCs (ratios in Het vs. KO are 27% vs. 17.2% at P22, 27% vs. 4.5 % at P0 and 24.4% vs. 6.5% at E15). Thus, Brn3a is required for the development of these cells but not for maintenance in the adult. In P0 and P22 induced Brn3aAP/KO RGCs we also detected an unusual dendritic arbor morphology reminiscent of ON betta RGCs, but distinguishable by larger areas and less dense dendritic coverage potentially representing abnormal ON betta RGCs resulting from relatively late loss of Brn3a. ON spiny RGCs are also selectively reduced in E15 and P0 but not adult inductions, suggesting an early dependency on Brn3a. Furthermore, two types of bistratified RGCs (LB and Brn3aKO – bistratifieds) are observed specifically in P0 and P22 induced Brn3aAP/KO RGCs. LB (Large Bistratifed) RGCs have been previously seen in WT circumstances 2,17,51, especially in Brn3b+ RGCs, and therefore could represent another shift of cell type specificity, induced only in RetCreERt2/WT Brn3aAP/KO RGCs. However, the simplified arbors of Brn3aKO-bistratifieds point to a developmental defect as a result of Brn3a loss, and is independent of Ret, since they were observed in Brn3a ablations using other Cre drivers 2,14.
Ret and Brn3a: Genetic interaction versus developmental dynamic shift of expression
Is it possible that the shift in RGC morphologies seen upon embryonic recombination reflects the dynamic expression pattern of Ret or Brn3a in RGCs? The dynamic expression pattern of Ret was shown to be important for specification of subpopulations of DRG neurons 44,45 and we have documented the dynamic expression of Ret in RGCs, Horizontal cells and Amacrines during embryonic and postnatal retinal development. However, the distribution of RGC types in RetCreERt2/WT; ROSA26AP/WT mice seems to be relatively stable from E15 through P14 to adult, (data in figure 7 in this study and figures 6 – 7 in 51), arguing that the expression profile of RetCreERt2 is relatively unchanged during RGC development. The cell type distribution is collected and analyzed in adult mice in all experiments, using AP expressed under the control of the Brn3a locus (Brn3aAP), thus reflecting only the adult expression profile of Brn3a.
The RGC morphologies observed when recombination is induced in adult RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT mice are in agreement with our previously published data regarding Brn3a expression in various RGC types. In previous studies, recombination was achieved using either transgenic elements (Pax6α:Cre or Rax:Cre) that are activated at E9.5 to 10.5, or sparse random recombination induced using alleles with no known biological effects or preferential expression patterns, under the control of the ROSA26 locus or CAG promoter, induced at a variety of ages, from E8 to adult. The repertoire of RGC types positive for Brn3a revealed by sparse labelling using general promoters (ROSA26, Pax6α:Cre) shows a dendrite lamination pattern typically excluding the innermost 20-30 % of the IPL. This pattern is confirmed by immunofluorescent staining in sections where the totality of Brn3aAP RGC dendrites is revealed using whole retina Cre drivers such as Pax6α:Cre and Rax:Cre (14,17,23 and Figure 7a in this study). It is therefore likely that P0 and adult-induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGCs accurately reflect the expression overlap of Ret and Brn3a in RGCs.
Overall, five cell types are unique to the E15 induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGCs population as contrasted to P0/adult induced RGCs: ONαS, M5, ON-DS, AT1 and AT2. They make up a sizeable fraction (47%) of all E15 induced RGCs. Of these, only ON-DS cells are known to be Brn3a positive in the adult and are also present in the general E15 Ret RGC expression profile (RetCreRt2; Rosa26iAP data), and thus could be explained by a shift of expression of Ret between E15 and P0/adult. The other four cell types have not been previously reported to be Brn3a positive. Furthermore, while ONαS, M5, and ON-DS cells are present in E15 and adult induced RetCreRt2; Rosa26iAP mice, AT1 and AT2 are completely missing from these data sets. Since ONαS and M5 can be reliably matched to Ret+ RGC types, their appearance in E15 induced Ret-Brn3a double heterozygotes could be interpreted as an induction of Brn3a expression in these cell types, or a cell type shift caused by the genetic interaction between Ret and Brn3a. In contrast AT2 and AT1 could be derived from a faulty cell type specification decision, separating them from the normal Ret+Brn3a+ fate and resulted from the combined heterozygote loss of Brn3a and Ret. AT2 is tentatively matched morphologically to cell type 85 in the EyeWire museum, and we described one instance in a general RGC description in 20041, and AT1 does appear to be a novel morphology. It is therefore possible that AT1 and AT2 morphologies result from developmental changes in SbC cells, which are absent from E15 specified RetCreERt2 Brn3aAP RGCs, but are present in large numbers in E15 induced RetCreRt2; Rosa26iAP RGCs. We conclude that labelling of ONα, M5, AT1 and AT2 RGCs in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGCs induced at E15 but not P0 and adult is a result of genetic interactions between Ret and Brn3a, rather than a reflection of a normal change in expression patterns of Ret, Brn3a or both throughout development. Presumably, cell type specificity and/or Ret and Brn3a expression are determined by P0, such that after a loss of one or even both alleles of Brn3a in conjunction with the heterozygous state of Ret, the distribution of Ret+Brn3a+ RGC types is relatively unaffected.
Sparse versus Complete double heterozygosity
In RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aCKOAP/KO mice, as sparse recombination is induced at either E15, P0 or adult, labelled RGCs lose one Brn3a allele in comparison to the surrounding tissue (Brn3aAP/WT = “Het” RGC in a Brn3aCKOAP/WT = “WT” territory, or Brn3aAP/KO = “KO” RGC in a Brn3aCKOAP/KO = “Het” territory, see Figure 1). If, as argued above, E15 induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT RGCs reveal a significant cell type distribution shift from the expected Ret+Brn3a+ fate, this would imply that the RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT double heterozygote state is sufficient to alter developmental choices in RGCs. We therefore compared RGCs from RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT; Rosa26iAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aWT/WT; Rosa26iAP/WT adult mice, in which recombination had been induced at E15. In this case, labelled RGCs are either double heterozygotes (RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aKO/WT) or single Ret heterozygotes (RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aWT/WT), respectively, and carry the same number of Ret and Brn3a alleles as the surrounding retinal tissue from conception into adulthood. Interestingly, we found that all RGC morphologies are consistent with the previously reported Ret expression domain, regardless of Brn3a dosage. Moreover, RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs labelled by P0 or P22 induction are effectively germline double heterozygotes before recombination, from conception to P0 or P22 respectively. These populations resemble the expected Ret+Brn3a+ expression domain (with the mentioned exceptions of ON and OFF β and ON Spiny RGCs), but are quite distinct from the E15 induced RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP RGCs, regardless of Brn3a dosage. Combined, these observations strongly suggest that only early sparse but not complete RetKO/WT; Brn3aKO/WT combined heterozygosity can induce significant shifts in cell type distribution or morphological changes in RGCs. Potentially, Ret signaling in combination with information provided through Brn3a transcriptional control acts as a competitive factor in cell type specification of RGCs. Sparse double heterozygotes receive altered signals compared to the surrounding tissue, and therefore adopt novel cell fates or acquire altered abnormal morphologies. In the germline double or single heterozygotes, labelled RGCs and surrounding tissue have the same dosage of Ret and Brn3a, resulting in unaltered RGC type specification decisions. A similar phenomenon is observed in Purkinje neurons, which exhibit defects in dendrite morphogenesis in the presence of sparse but not germline knockout of the TrkC neurotrophin receptor 59.
What are the molecular mechanisms of cross-talk between Ret and Brn3a?
In the somatosensory system there is a well-established role for neurotrophic signaling in neuronal specification, survival, differentiation, and neurite growth and branching 24–27,38,56,60. TrkA/B/C as well as Ret and its GFRα co-receptors are necessary for the specification of classes of nociceptors, mechanoreceptors and proprioceptors 43–45. Transcriptional regulation of neurotrophic receptors plays a major role in cell type specification of other projection sensory neurons 61–63. Brn3a and its family members are important regulators of development and specification of projection neurons in the Trigeminal Ganglion (TG), Spiral Ganglion (SG) and Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) 19,22,56,64–70, and their functions are mediated at least in part through regulation of neurotrophic receptors. In the Brn3aKO/KO TG, TrkC expression is essentially lost from onset (E10.5), while TrkA and TrkB are initially (E10.5) expressed but turn off at E15.5, followed by extensive cell death in the TG. By E17, only 30 % of Brn3aKO/KO TG neurons survive, a majority of which express the Ret receptor 68. These changes in neurotrophin receptors are accompanied by significant shifts in cell type distribution 71–74. In the spiral (acoustic) ganglion of Brn3aKO/KO mice TrkC is downregulated resulting in dendritic arbor abnormalities 67. Brn3a loss of function also affects cell type distributions in a variety of DRG cell types 75–78, accompanied by dynamic changes in numbers of TrkA, TrkB and TrkC receptors, and increase in Ret+ cell numbers 69. Significantly, in DRGs, Brn3a is a direct transcriptional regulator of TrkA 79, while in RGCs Brn3a loss may modestly affect TrkA expression levels 9,23. In the retina, some TFs are shown to modulate neurotrophic signaling components. For instance, Dlx2, a known activator of Brn3b 80, also directly regulates TrkB receptor expression in RGCs 81. Conversely, instances of control of TFs by neurotrophins were documented in motor and sensory systems. Dendritic branching and connectivity of a subset of motor neurons in spinal cord is controlled by a TF encoded by the Pea3 gene, which is in turn induced by target derived GDNF signaling 82. In DRGs, GDNF activates a transcriptional program repressing neurite growth of sensory neurons 83.
Surprisingly, not much is known about Ret and Trk control of cell type specification and dendrite formation in RGCs. Gain and loss of function manipulations of the BDNF/NT4 – TrkB axis in mice and frogs did not result in RGC loss, however produced a range of phenotypes including changes in dendritic arbor formation and RGC axon shifts towards small diameter fibers30,36,37.
We now show that Ret, GFRα and Trk receptor expression levels are regulated in RGCs by Brn3 transcription factors (9,23 and Figures 7–9). In our hands, the numbers of RetCFP, Brn3a and Brn3b-expressing RGCs are largely conserved between RetKO/KO (RetCFP/CFP) and control animals. While our previous RNAseq experiments did not show a significant Brn3a-dependency of Ret gene expression in early postnatal age 9,51, we now find that in adults, Ret expression in the retina-specific Brn3a knockout is moderately but significantly altered. The partial redistribution of double positive (Ret+AP+) in controls to single (Ret+) cells in Brn3aKO/KO retinas may be due to the loss of some (Brn3a+Ret+) - expressing neurons such as ON and OFF β and ON spiny RGCs. When compared to the wild type, Brn3aAP/KO retinas exhibit a significant increase in GFRα1+, GFRα2+ and GFRα3+ cells in the GCL, at the expense of Brn3aAP RGCs, potentially indicating that Brn3a expression suppresses Ret-GFRα expression in certain RGC types, leading to choices in cell type specification or morphological features in the dendritic arbors. On the contrary, numbers of TrkA+ Brn3aAP and TrkC+ Brn3aAP RGCs are somewhat reduced in Brn3aAP/KO compared to Brn3aAP/WT retinas, while TrkA+ and TrkC+ cell numbers in the GCL are increased. By analogy with the TGG and DRG systems, these shifts could induce alternative RGC cell type decisions.
Taken together, our data suggest that in the sparsely recombined RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs, the dosage reduction of Brn3a significantly affects the expression of signaling components of the Ret (Ret, GFRα-s or downstream molecules) and/or Trk pathway, that, when combined with the Ret heterozygosity, result in shifts in cell type specification or morphological defects. Ret can function as a competitive coreceptor for ligands involved in neuronal arbor formation and axon guidance, such as ephrin and p75-NTR 84 and Plexin /NCAMs 85, some of which are under transcriptional control of Brn3a 9,23. Thus, it is possible that the reduced Brn3a dosage in RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/WT and RetCreERt2/WT; Brn3aAP/KO RGCs results in partial loss of these co-receptors, and consequentially in morphological defects.
The proposed competitive nature of the Ret – Brn3a genetic interaction in the context of RGC specification could read out signals necessary to specify the appropriate numbers and spacing of distinct RGC types. Since both Ret and Brn3a are postmitotically expressed in RGCs, this could mean that RGC type fate is still plastic after exiting the cell cycle, as has been proposed for photoreceptors 86–89. This mechanism could then explain how individual retinal clones originating early in retinal development can adjust their composition to accommodate the diversity of RGC type distribution and density, by shifting cell type specificity according to local neurotrophic signaling originating from other already specified RGC types. Alternatively, target derived neurotrophic support could help eliminate excess RGCs, by engaging either Ret-GFRα or TrkA-C signaling in an activity or Brn3a dependent manner. Intriguingly, Ret ligands GDNF and Neurturin, and Trk ligands BDNF, NGF and NT3 are differentially expressed at relevant developmental stages in other retinal neurons, RGCs themselves or retinorecipient brain areas (Sajgo, 2017 and Supplementary figures 1–2). It will remain to explore which of these sources are relevant in the competitive mechanism we propose.
V.M. and T.B. designed experiments, prepared figures and wrote Manuscript. V.M. performed all experiments and collected all data.
The authors declare no competing interests.
All data related to this manuscript will be made available upon request from the corresponding authors.
Acknowledgements
Wenqin Luo – U. Pennsylvania and Hideki Enomoto – Kobe University for helpful comments and providing mouse lines. Nadia Parmhans for assistance with Genotyping.
Footnotes
Minor edits to text for increased clarity, and included the figures/figure legends at more or less ideal positions in the text.